Bureau of Justice Statistics,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Filename: fdluc04statg.csv,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, "Appendix table G. Adjudication outcome for felony defendants, by SCPS jurisdiction, 2004",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, "Report title: Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2004 - Statistical Tables NCJ 221374",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Data source: 2004 State Court Processing Statistics Program,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Refer questions to: askbjs@usdoj.gov 202-307-0765,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Authors: Tracey Kyckelhahn and Thomas H. Cohen ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Date of version: 04/24/2008,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, "Appendix table G. Adjudication outcome for felony defendants, by SCPS jurisdiction, 2004",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,Percent of felony defendants,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,Adjudication outcome,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,Convicted,,,,Not convicted,,,,,,, County (State),Adjudicated within 1 year,, Total,, Felony,, Misdemeanor,, Total,, Dismissed,,Acquitted,, Other outcome* , Total,88,%,68,%,59,%,9,%,23,%,22,%,1,%,9,% Jefferson (AL),73,%,60,%,55,%,5,%,28,%,28,%,1,%,12,% Maricopa (AZ),91,,62,,61,,1,,35,,35,,0,,3, Pima (AZ),95,,53,,51,,2,,45,,45,,--,,1, Alameda (CA),94,,79,,76,,3,,15,,15,,0,,6, Contra Costa (CA),85,,81,,72,,9,,11,,11,,0,,9, Los Angeles (CA),96,,83,,80,,3,,8,,8,,--,,9, Orange (CA),94,,81,,77,,4,,4,,4,,--,,15, Riverside (CA),91,,91,,85,,6,,3,,2,,--,,7, San Bernardino (CA),90,%,95,%,94,%,1,%,--,%,--,%,--,%,5,% San Diego (CA),97,,90,,88,,2,,6,,6,,--,,4, San Mateo (CA),94,,74,,70,,4,,9,,8,,1,,17, Santa Clara (CA),95,,81,,78,,3,,6,,6,,0,,13, Broward (FL),86,,56,,56,,0,,16,,16,,0,,28, Miami-Dade (FL),87,,51,,51,,0,,32,,31,,1,,18, Palm Beach (FL),90,,57,,43,,14,,25,,24,,1,,18, Pinellas (FL),92,,49,,44,,5,,28,,28,,0,,23, Fulton (GA),78,%,53,%,40,%,13,%,26,%,26,%,0,%,21,% Honolulu (HI),85,,75,,75,,0,,2,,1,,1,,23, Cook (IL),89,,60,,58,,2,,39,,39,,1,,--, Marion (IN),83,,58,,53,,5,,39,,38,,2,,3, Baltimore (MD),88,,48,,35,,13,,36,,34,,1,,17, Montgomery (MD),95,,53,,44,,9,,39,,38,,1,,8, Wayne (MI),97,,62,,58,,4,,14,,11,,3,,24, Essex (NJ),80,%,60,%,26,%,34,%,36,%,35,%,1,%,4,% Bronx (NY),82,,63,,34,,29,,36,,35,,0,,2, Kings (NY),92,,42,,26,,16,,55,,54,,1,,3, Nassau (NY),94,,85,,44,,41,,15,,15,,0,,0, Queens (NY),91,,74,,31,,43,,24,,24,,--,,2, Westchester (NY),59,,77,,37,,40,,23,,22,,1,,0, Franklin (OH),92,,…,,…,,…,,…,,…,,…,,…, Montgomery (PA),77,,82,,48,,34,,12,,12,,0,,6, Philadelphia (PA),70,,40,,38,,2,,58,,53,,5,,2, Shelby (TN),76,%,70,%,35,%,35,%,21,%,21,%,0,%,10,% Dallas (TX),79,,88,,82,,7,,10,,10,,--,,2, El Paso (TX),82,,51,,48,,2,,23,,22,,--,,27, Harris (TX),95,,71,,68,,3,,11,,11,,--,,18, Tarrant (TX),81,,69,,69,,--,,18,,18,,0,,13, Travis (TX),87,,71,,70,,1,,21,,21,,0,,8, Salt Lake (UT),87,,69,,57,,12,,24,,23,,1,,7, Fairfax (VA),94,,55,,23,,32,,43,,43,,0,,2, --Less than 0.5%. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, *Includes diversion and deferred adjudication.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, . . . Data were not available for this jurisdiction.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,