U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

The BJA/PERF Body Armor National Survey: Protecting the Nation's Law Enforcement Officers, Phase II Final Report

NCJ Number
Date Published
September 2009
72 pages
This study assessed the differences across law enforcement agencies nationwide in their policies and practices regarding body armor use.
Highlights of findings include: 1) almost all law enforcement agencies (99.4 percent) nationwide reported that their officers wear body armor when on duty; 2) while not a requirement of many law enforcement agencies (41 percent do not require their officers to wear body armor), almost all agencies do provide fiscal support/resources to ensure their officers wear body armor; and 3) there was an overall move by agencies towards promoting the wearing of body armor and providing the necessary resources to do so. These findings of agencies' policies indicate that officers were more likely to be wearing body armor while assaulted in the line of duty, and the number of officer deaths was lower than it otherwise would be. On the other hand, while most agencies did encourage the wearing of body armor, most did not have stringent fit and maintenance policies, and most did not conduct inspections of armor to ensure proper fit and maintenance. The purpose of this study conducted by PERF for the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) was to add to the understanding of body armor policies and practices among law enforcement agencies across the Nation. This BJA Body Armor Survey was the second phase of a large-scale project regarding body armor and officer safety. Phase One focused on the use of Zylon-based body armor by the 100 largest law enforcement agencies in the United States. This second study, Phase Two, collected additional data on the use of body armor from a large, nationally representative sample of law enforcement agencies. Data were collected on policies regarding the wearing of body armor, whether officers were provided with armor or must purchase it themselves, the types of body armor used, fitting and maintenance of armor, and data on outcomes of use and officer safety. Figures, tables, references and appendixes A-E

Date Published: September 1, 2009