NCJ Number
101882
Journal
Trial Volume: 22 Issue: 6 Dated: (June 1986) Pages: 60-67
Date Published
1986
Length
7 pages
Annotation
This article discusses court decisions pertaining to videotape evidence, explains the types of videotape evidence trial attorneys might use, and gives foundation for authentication and admissibility, such as being relevant and nonprejudicial.
Abstract
Videotape may be used to demonstrate places or objects that cannot be brought to court, preaccident and postaccident conditions, tests or experiments associated with testimony, and reconstructed incidents. Videotapes for evidence should be carefully prepared to present facts rather than opinion, and narration is best presented by a witness in court to avoid the hearsay objection. Videotapes, including any edited portions, should be available to opposing counsel prior to trial. Once a videotape is introduced into evidence, it assumes the status of any other admitted exhibit. It may be used during final argument. Technical differences between videotape and motion picture film -- differences that facilitate the admission of taped evidence -- should be called to the court's attention. 33 notes.