This file is provided for reference purposes only. It was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated. Please send an email for questions or for further information.
Office of Justice Programs SealU.S. Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Innovation. Partnerships. Safer Neighborhoods.
OJP Fact SheetOJP Fact Sheet

Indigent Defense

Despite the right to counsel guaranteed in the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, in many places economically disadvantaged defendants still are not represented or are underrepresented. Indigent defendants are often forced to wait in jail for long periods of time before ever meeting with an attorney. Heavy caseloads, insufficient resources, and inadequate oversight make it difficult for many attorneys representing indigent clients to completely fulfill their legal and ethical obligations.

The defense of indigent juveniles poses its own unique problems for the proper and fair functioning of the justice system. Youth defendants are often encouraged (to their disadvantage) to waive the right to counsel. Many courts accept these waivers with little challenge.


Since the 1963 Supreme Court Gideon v. Wainwright ruling, states, counties, and local jurisdictions have established varying means of providing public representation for defendants unable to afford a private attorney.??To determine whether a defendant qualifies as indigent, states and localities may consider the defendant’s income level, eligibility for public assistance, and debt levels.??Indigent defense is then typically provided through one or a combination of three methods: a public defender office, an assigned counsel system, or a contract system.

The diversity of indigent defense services across the nation makes it difficult to evaluate the current state of indigent defense and collect timely, national information.??The report of a recent Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) study, Public Defender Offices, 2007, highlights the heavy caseloads and limited resources of public defender offices nationwide; in some areas, the basic foundation for an indigent defense system does not exist.

What OJP Is Doing

The Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) has instituted a number of projects, programs, and funding opportunities to support and assist state and local indigent defense systems. BJA launched an Indigent Defense Hiring Project to reduce caseloads and improve the quality of representation available to indigent defendants. BJA also provides seed money for a national fellowship program aimed at increasing the number of qualified public defense lawyers. BJA’s Improving Court Communication program works to increase indigent defendants’ understanding of the judicial process and their rights. Finally, BJA is providing funding to expand the Bronx Defender Holistic Advocacy Program, which is working to create an online resource and technical assistance center.

The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention supports a Juvenile Indigent Defense National Clearinghouse program. This program provides a broad range of activities to improve the overall level of systemic advocacy, improve the quality of representation of indigent juveniles, and ensure ongoing technical support to the juvenile indigent defense bar.

In addition to these programs and the comprehensive analysis conducted by BJS, OJP participated in the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) National Symposium on Indigent Defense in 2010. The symposium was called to focus on the stagnation that has occurred in addressing this issue during the past several years. Following the symposium, the Attorney General launched the Access to Justice Initiative (ATJ), which aims to improve indigent defense, enhance access to legal services for the economically disadvantaged, and promote alternatives to court-intensive solutions.

In January 2011, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) and ATJ co-hosted the Indigent Defense: International Perspectives and Research Needs workshop to identify both domestic and international best practices for representing low-income defendants and to devise a robust research agenda on criminal indigent defense in the United States. The Expert Working Group Report generated from the workshop, which will inform DOJ priorities and NIJ’s future research agenda on indigent defense, was issued in September 2011.

December 2011
The [criminal justice] system works only when every part of it functions effectively. That is why addressing the crisis in indigent defense is so crucial.
–Laurie O. Robinson, Assistant
     Attorney General
  The National Symposium on
     Indigent Defense, February 2010
Fast Facts
  • In 2007, 964 public defender offices nationwide received nearly 6 million indigent defense cases.
  • State-based public defender programs reported receiving a median of 82 felony cases, 217 misdemeanor cases, and 2 appeals cases for every single, full-time litigating attorney.
  • Misdemeanor cases accounted for about 40 percent of all cases received by state-based public defender offices and about 50 percent of the cases received by county-based offices.
  • More than 15,000 full-time equivalent litigating attorneys were employed by public defender offices in 2007.
  • A study of the 100 most populous counties in the United States found that 82 percent of indigent clients were handled by public defenders, 15 percent by assigned counsel attorneys, and 3 percent by contract attorneys.
  • Only 42 percent of youth in custody report that they have a lawyer.

Sources: Public Defender Offices, 2007 ??? Statistical Tables (Revised); Indigent Defense Services in Large Counties, 1999; Conditions of Confinement: Findings From the Survey of Youth in Residential Placement

Contact Us
Office of Justice Programs
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
Phone: 202???307???0703
Web site:
bottom border
This file is provided for reference purposes only. It was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated. Please send an email for questions or for further information.