FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, June 16, 2006 https://ojp.gov/ |
Office of Justice Programs
|
Contact: Catherine Sanders
|
Phone: (202) 307-0703
|
TTY: (202) 514-1888
|
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ISSUES NEW STUDY ABOUT DRUG COURTS
***PUBLICATION ADVISORY***
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ISSUES NEW STUDY ABOUT DRUG COURTS
WASHINGTON,
D.C.
– A new publication from the Department of Justice's Office of Justice Programs' (OJP) National Institute of Justice (
NIJ ), Drug Courts: The Second Decade, summarizes research that practitioners and policymakers will find useful in shaping the future of drug courts. The findings
are based on several
NIJ -funded studies that evaluated the way drug courts operate. Among the major findings were:
- Drug courts appear to reduce recidivism. The effectiveness of a court may depend on how consistently the court resources match
the needs of drug court participants.
- The judge's role is critical to a drug court participant's success. Interaction with a judge was found to be pivotal in keeping
participants in the program.
- Treatment works best when it is based on proper assessment, service delivery, and monitoring. It should include compatible
approaches based on formal theories of drug abuse and dependence, the best therapeutic tools available, and opportunities
to build cognitive skills. Effectiveness is weakened by approaches based on incompatible philosophies.
- Research about juvenile drug courts and treatment has not yet provided guidance on the most effective practices and policies
for juvenile offenders who usually have a wide range of needs and issues. Until more research is available, it is unclear
whether the proper mission for juvenile drug courts is prevention or intervention.
- Drug courts can be cost effective. An analysis of one court, (Multnomah County, Oregon), estimated the average investment
per program participant was $5,900 and the savings were $2,300 in avoided criminal justice system costs, and $1,300 in avoided
victimization costs over a 30 month-period.
The first drug court was established in 1989 in
Miami,
Florida
with the goal of reducing criminal behavior and substance abuse and to free the courts and criminal justice system to handle
other cases. Drug courts combine judicial supervision, mandatory drug testing, graduated sanctions and rewards, and treatment
to help substance-abusing offenders break the cycle of addiction -- and the crime that often accompanies it. Drug court judges
work with prosecutors, defense attorneys, probation officers, and drug treatment specialists to require appropriate treatment
for offenders, monitor their progress, and ensure the delivery of other services, like education or job skills training, to
help offenders remain crime and drug-free.
Copies of Drug Courts: The Second Decade, are available on the
NIJ Web site at www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij and through the National Criminal Justice Reference Service Web site at: www.ncjrs.gov.
The Office of Justice Programs provides federal leadership in developing the nation's capacity to prevent and
control crime, administer justice and assist victims. OJP is headed by an Assistant Attorney General and comprises five component
bureaus and an office: the Bureau of Justice Assistance; the Bureau of Justice Statistics; the National Institute of Justice;
the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; and the Office for Victims of Crime, as well as the Community Capacity
Development Office, which incorporates the Weed and Seed strategy and OJP's American Indian and Alaska Native Affairs Desk.
More information can be found at www.ojp.usdoj.gov.
###
NIJ06056
|