Results show that mental health (except for substance use) does little, above and beyond traditional criminogenic risk markers and control variables, to significantly increase or decrease the risk of rearrest, a finding that was largely replicated across race/ethnicity. Some evidence emerged that the mechanisms by which mental health/substance use disorders and criminogenic risk interact to affect risk of rearrest operated differently across race/ethnic groups. Mental health conditions may have some small relationship to rearrest, but this effect is dwarfed by other more powerful risk factors such as antisocial history. Research is needed assessing the conditions under which mental health is implicated in offending. Data from the Pathways to Desistance, a longitudinal study of serious adolescent offenders, were used to estimate the risk of rearrest over time. 54 references (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- The Role of Professional Development in Shaping Teachers' Youth Mental Health First Aid Experiences: Does Prior Mental Health Training Matter?
- Landscape Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Criminal Justice System
- Unraveling the Contextual Effects on Student Suspension and Juvenile Arrest: The Independent and Interdependent Influences of School, Neighborhood, and Family Social Controls