They had received extensive neuropsychiatric evaluations during adolescence, at an average age of 15 years, and were interviewed approximately 9 years later as young adults. On followup, 26 gave histories of childhood abuse that differed with histories obtained from records and interviews conducted in adolescents. Eleven of the participants agreed to an additional clarification interview, at which they were informed of the discrepancies. Of these, eight had adolescent records indicating that child abuse had occurred, but they denied abuse during the adult follow-up interview. The other three participants had adolescent records indicating that no abuse had ever occurred, but they reported at the followup that abuse had occurred. The additional clarification interviews revealed that all 11 participants with histories with discrepancies had actually been abused. Findings indicated that information gathered retrospectively from adults regarding child abuse is often inaccurate and that among the former delinquents, abuse was underreported. The research also indicated that questions regarding possible abuse must be asked in a variety of contexts and that the way in which questions are phrased affects the comfort and honesty of the person responding. 9 references and abstracts in French and Spanish
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Prediction of Skull Fracture Risk for Children 0-9 Months Old Through Validated Parametric Finite Element Model and Cadaver Test Reconstruction
- Improving and Evaluating Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Investigation of Fatalities Involving Suspected Head Trauma
- Neighborhood Disadvantage, Social Groups, and Adolescent Violence: Assessing Mechanisms in Structural-Cultural Theories