The processing stages analyzed included screening, preliminary hearing, arraignment, guilty plea versus trial, and sentencing. Theoretical models of judicial decisionmaking were presented within the framework of the organizational perspective. The findings indicate that judges and prosecutors attempted to sort out cases with a low probability of conviction or involving less defendant criminality in the stages preceding conviction. After conviction, judges showed a greater willingness to impose severe sentences; the severity was influenced by the defendant's offense seriousness, uncooperativeness with the court, resistance to rehabilitation, or potential public threat. Interestingly, the findings indicate that minorities are more likely to be screened out in the earlier judicial stages, but more likely to receive severe sentences if they are eventually convicted. Female offenders are more likely than males to be dismissed in the preliminary and arraignment stages and to receive shorter sentences if convicted. 1 table, 5 notes, and 53 references (Author abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Does variation across judicial circuits matter? Examining the role of bail schedules and pretrial detention on drug case outcomes in Florida
- Using Citizen Notification To Interrupt Near-Repeat Residential Burglary Patterns: the Micro-Level Near-Repeat Experiment
- Changing Fortunes or Changing Attitudes? Sentencing and Corrections Reforms in 2003