The distance from which an eyewitness views a perpetrator is a critical factor for eyewitness identification, but has received little research attention, so we presented three mock-crime videos to participants, varying distance to three perpetrators (3, 10, or 20 m).
Across two experiments, increased distance reduced empirical discriminability in the form of a mirror effect, such that correct identifications decreased while false identifications increased. Moreover, high confidence identifications were associated with high accuracy at 3 m (Experiment 1 and 2) and 10 m (Experiment 2), but not at 20 m. We conclude that eyewitnesses may be less likely to identify a perpetrator viewed at a distance, and also more likely to falsely identify an innocent suspect. Furthermore, there may be certain boundary conditions associated with distance and the impact it has on the confidence–accuracy relationship. More research is needed to elucidate the effect of estimator variable manipulations on the confidence–accuracy relationship. (Publisher abstract provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and the Family Environment: Examining the Association Between ACEs and Different Types of Juvenile Recidivism
- Frontal sinus morphology as a forensic identification method: a comparison of intra-observer scores between scout radiographs and 3D skull images
- A Rapid and Accurate Method for Hemp Compliance Testing Using Liquid Chromatography Diode Array Detector With Optional Electrospray Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry