Day fines replaced two-thirds of fixed fines in penal law cases sentenced by judges during the pilot year. The remaining one-third of the fines were fixed fines imposed by non-Staten Island judges sitting temporarily in the court to cover for vacationing or sick colleagues. These judges had not been trained to use day fines and, therefore, used the traditional tariff system to set the fine amount. All judges trained to use day fines did so consistently throughout the pilot year without tying up their calendars. The mechanics of imposing a day fine were not too complex or time-consuming to be applied routinely in a fast-paced criminal court. The introduction of day fines did not meaningfully affect judges' sentencing decisions during the pilot year. Even when prior conviction record and arraignment charges were controlled, sentencing patterns were stable during the initial period in which day fines were introduced. The only small but noticeable change in sentencing patterns was an increase in jail sentences for some drug cases. The impact of day fines on fine amounts, collection and enforcement outcomes, and equity and sentence displacement is detailed. Information on the research design and supporting tabular data are appended. 57 references and 62 tables
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Examining the Dynamics of Serious Violent Incidents Among Inner-City, Adolescent, Public School Students in Atlanta, Georgia (From Trends, Risks, and Interventions in Lethal Violence: Proceedings of the Third Annual Spring Symposium of the Homicide Resear
- Outcome Evaluation of Jail-Based Drug Treatment: Effects on Recidivism
- Report From the States on What Works at the State and Local Levels: A Compendium of Assessment and Evaluation Results