This research report examines the implications of prescreening trace evidence before obtaining a likelihood ratio; it describes the proposed procedure for studying prescreening before the evaluation of an LR or an SLR; it presents the results from simulation studies, as well as the application to various forensics datasets.
Source prescreening is a methodology where forensic examiners select samples that are similar to given trace evidence to represent the background population. This background evidence helps assign a value of evidence using a likelihood ratio or Bayes factor. A potential benefit of prescreening is a mitigation of effects from subpopulation structures within the alternative source population by isolating the relevant subpopulation. This paper examines the impact of prescreening before assigning evidence value. Extensive simulations with synthetic and real data, including trace element and fingerprint score examples, were conducted. The findings indicate that when the subpopulation structure is known, prescreening can provide an accurate evidence value in cases of subpopulation structures. The study suggests that prescreening can be beneficial, but the prescreening method and level should be transparently reported alongside the evidence value. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Eyewitness Identifications Investigating the Validity of the US Supreme Court's Guidelines - Final Report
- Just Science Podcast: Just Collecting More Evidence from Cartridge Cases
- Toxicology testing in the USA: what the 2018 census of medical examiner and coroner offices tells us