Of 32 States responding to the survey, the most responses were received from California, Florida, New York, New Jersey, and Texas. It was found that about half of prosecutors operated special environmental prosecution units. More than half assigned full-time prosecutors to environmental offense cases, and over 75 percent assigned part-time prosecutors to these cases. Most offices observed an increase in environmental offense cases over the survey period. The most common environmental offenses involved illegal hazardous waste disposal. The most important factors in deciding to prosecute environmental offenses were the degree of harm posed by the offense and the offender's criminal intent. The most significant factor in rejecting environmental offense prosecution concerned insufficient evidence or inability to recognize appropriate evidence. The least significant factor was lack of resources. Less than half of local prosecutors believed they could enroll in training to qualify as experts in environmental offense investigation and prosecution. Almost all indicated a need for increased technical assistance and training to improve the performance of environmental prosecution unit personnel. 3 exhibits
Similar Publications
- Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of Rural School Support Strategies for behavioral interventions: a mixed methods evaluation over two years of a hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial
- Characteristics of officer-involved vehicle collisions in California
- The Cost of Crime: The HAVEN Conceptual Framework for Measuring Victim Harms from Violence