This paper presents the authors’ research into the usage of restrictive housing and the prevalence and trends in the use of the most routine forms of restrictive housing in Ohio prisons over the course of nine years.
Concerns about restrictive housing are motivated in part by the assumption that as prison systems expanded and became more punitive, restrictive housing became overly routine. Limited empirical research exists, however, that quantifies its usage. The goal of this paper is twofold. First, the authors argue that a more detailed understanding of restrictive housing usage is required to advance theory, research, and evidence-based policy. Second, they bring data to bear on questions about the prevalence and trends in the use of the most routine forms of restrictive housing in Ohio prisons. The authors analyze nine years of event history data to develop an empirical portrait of its use across the system and over time; they track how many individuals are placed and how long they are placed; they also examine variation across facility characteristics. They conclude the paper with a discussion focused on extending this work to investigate restrictive housing usage and impacts. Publisher Abstract Provided
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Improving and Evaluating Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Investigation of Fatalities Involving Suspected Head Trauma
- Determining Fracture Timing from Microscopic Characteristics of Cortical Bone
- Trauma Behind the Keyboard: Exploring Disparities in Child Sexual Abuse Material Exposure and Mental Health Factors among Police Investigators and Forensic Examiners – A Network Analysis