NCJ Number
97960
Journal
Journal of Research in Crime an Delinquency Volume: 22 Issue: 2 Dated: (May 1985) Pages: 101-133
Date Published
1985
Length
32 pages
Annotation
Because the most important court decisions are not regulated by due process, any study concerned with discrimination should examine those informal processes. This study focuses on the processes of charge bargaining and sentence reduction.
Abstract
We identify criteria associated with these decisions and examine the differences in outcomes by gender of the defendant. It is found that dimensions of defense are the most important in determining a plea outcome favorable to the defendant, and that males fare better than females in this process. This suggests that policies stressing equalization of defense resources might be crucial in the regulation of plea bargaining. (Author abstract)
Date Published: January 1, 1985
Downloads
No download available
Similar Publications
- Investigating Disparities in Behavior and Care Between Alaska Native and White Victims of Sexual Violence: The Importance of Culturally Competent Nursing Care
- Profiles of Youth In-Person and Online Sexual Harassment Victimization
- The Role of Acculturation in the Relation Between Intimate Partner Violence and Substance Misuse Among IPV-victimized Hispanic Women in the Community