The proposed conceptual framework reasons that because actual rehabilitation is often off-limits, institutional goals are organized around caring, control, and self-governance; caring is exhibited by supervision officers in lieu of substantive assistance toward rehabilitation; control for the sake of public safety remains a key aim of community supervision; and self-governance is an unstated institutional goal through which women are forced to take on the invisible work of managing their own rehabilitation. The author further argues that decarceration's continued emphasis on control for the sake of public safety impedes the transformative potential of efforts to restructure the crime-processing system. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Prison Versus Probation in California - Implications for Crime and Offender Recidivism
- Four Site Assessment of the Integrated Criminal Apprehension Program - Final Report
- Drug Use as a Predictor of Rearrest or Failure to Appear: A User's Guide to the Machine-Readable Files and Documentation, Original Instruments, and Codebook