This study explored how parolees with substance use disorders (SUDs) perceive parole supervision.
In this study, researchers analyzed in-depth qualitative interviews conducted with reentering men with substance use disorders (SUDs) as they navigated parole in Pennsylvania. The study found that SUDs present a significant barrier to reentry success, and the tension of surveillance and revocation is amplified for those enduring simultaneous reentry and recovery. The respondents regarded parole officers more positively than they view parole as an institution, yet this perception of officers does not equate to provision of reintegration and recovery support. Respondents perceive that parole presents unnecessary additional hurdles to their reentry success, and their perceived risk level impacts their surveillance intensity. The information gleaned through inclusion of perspectives from those enduring parole supervision calls for a critical assessment of current parole practices. Further, the current approach to SUDs within community supervision criminalizes relapse without provision of treatment resources or support. While extant research has looked at parole and its various actors as an institution, few studies recount the parole experience from the perspective of parolees. Additionally, despite the prevalence of substance use disorders (SUDs) within the criminal justice system, research that assesses the additional challenges this population faces throughout parole supervision is even scarcer. Three independent coders identified all narratives relating to a broad theme of “parole and probation experiences.” The authors then completed iterative rounds of more fine-grained independent coding within that theme. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Second Chance Act (SCA) Grant Program Evaluation: Interim Report on Program Implementation in Three SCA Sites
- Testing Probation Outcomes in an Evidence-Based Practice Setting: Reduced Caseload Size and Intensive Supervision Effectiveness
- Phase Two of ETA: Evaluation of Technology-based Advocacy Services, Brief Summary