Research concerning these reforms has concentrated on their immediate goal of reducing sentence disparity. The current research was conducted to evaluate the impact of sentencing reforms on prisons and crime rates. A pooled time series-cross section design was used that incorporated data for each State during the 1970's and 1980's. It was found that, in most instances, sentencing reforms had little impact on the prison population, the number of prison admissions, or prison terms. A few laws, however, were followed by significant changes, especially reduced prison population growth in sentencing guideline States (Florida, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington). Even less evidence was found to show that sentencing reforms affected crime rates, and there was little indication that sentencing laws had a significant deterrent impact. The authors conclude that differences between sentencing laws and their settings differ from State to State and that the impact of sentencing reforms varies greatly. 44 references and 9 tables
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Evaluating the impact of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Policies in California Jails
- Utilizing eDNA from Bacteria, Fungi, Plants, and Arthropods Associated with Mock Geologic Evidence for Sample-to-Sample Comparisons and Study Site Separation: A Feasibility Study
- NIJ (National Institute of Justice)/Hoover Institution Conference on Economic Activity and Crime - A Summary and Comments