Motivated by the development of a large macromorphoscopic database-which will potentially utilize data collected in 2002-quantification of observer error, the impact of technological improvements in macromorphoscopic trait data collection and observer experience is necessary. To maximize comparisons between the two samples, ten macromorphoscopic traits were assessed. Results revealed three patterns of error relating to observer experience, the introduction of new technologies, and error inherent in the method. Overall, this study found the effect of error on macromorphoscopic trait analysis could be predicted and did not significantly impact their utility. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Frontal sinus morphology as a forensic identification method: a comparison of intra-observer scores between scout radiographs and 3D skull images
- Exploring the Relationship Between Dental Development, Population Variation, and Environment
- Symptoms Consistent With Shift Work Disorder Are Common Across Groups of First Responders