Principal differences between the standard of the Personal Protective Armor Association (PPAA) and the standard of the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) are the PPAA's attempts to lower the requirements -- by averaging blunt trauma measurements, lowering the threat from all ammunition by spreading the velocities, allowing lower velocity passes, using test ammunition that deforms more easily, making waterproofing optional, and prescribing labels that not only do not list the ballistic threats, but appear to place the liability for selection on the individual wearer or his or her department. This serves to modify or eliminate many of those requirements and test methods of the NIJ standard, thus placing police officers' lives in jeopardy.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- “They had to change the model to fit the victim, versus the victim having to fit the model”: Innovative solutions in community response to commercial sexual exploitation
- Using Citizen Notification To Interrupt Near-Repeat Residential Burglary Patterns: the Micro-Level Near-Repeat Experiment
- COGNITIVE RADIO ACCESS MANAGEMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS