Since to date there has not been an adequate review of the methodological transparency of journal articles that include interviews with extremists, this study analyzed the content of 48 articles that involved such interviews.
The number of journal articles that rely on data derived from interviews with extremists has increased substantially over the past decade. This burgeoning invites the possibility that standardized reporting practices have not been explicitly clarified. The current study found that field-wide methodological transparency is lacking. Recommendations are presented for improving methodological transparency, with the implication that consensus on optimal reporting practices within the extremism literature should be reached soon. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Atypical Work Hours and Adaptation in Law Enforcement: Targets for Disease Prevention
- Raman Spectroscopy and Chemometrics for Forensic Bloodstain Analysis: Species Differentiation, Donor Age Estimation, and Dating of Bloodstains
- In Pursuit of Fairness: A Research Note on Gender Responsivity and Racial Bias in Criminal Justice Actuarial Risk Assessments