Since to date there has not been an adequate review of the methodological transparency of journal articles that include interviews with extremists, this study analyzed the content of 48 articles that involved such interviews.
The number of journal articles that rely on data derived from interviews with extremists has increased substantially over the past decade. This burgeoning invites the possibility that standardized reporting practices have not been explicitly clarified. The current study found that field-wide methodological transparency is lacking. Recommendations are presented for improving methodological transparency, with the implication that consensus on optimal reporting practices within the extremism literature should be reached soon. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emergency Lighting, Retroreflective Markings, and Paint Color on Policing and Law Enforcement Safety
- Mental Health and Rape History in Relation to Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs in a National Sample of Women
- School Threat Assessment Versus Suicide Assessment: Statewide Prevalence and Case Characteristics.