Since to date there has not been an adequate review of the methodological transparency of journal articles that include interviews with extremists, this study analyzed the content of 48 articles that involved such interviews.
The number of journal articles that rely on data derived from interviews with extremists has increased substantially over the past decade. This burgeoning invites the possibility that standardized reporting practices have not been explicitly clarified. The current study found that field-wide methodological transparency is lacking. Recommendations are presented for improving methodological transparency, with the implication that consensus on optimal reporting practices within the extremism literature should be reached soon. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Do Crime Hot Spots Move? Exploring the Effects of the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem and Modifiable Temporal Unit Problem on Crime Hot Spot Stability
- Incapacitated, Forcible, and Drug/Alcohol-Facilitated Rape in Relation to Binge Drinking, Marijuana Use, and Illicit Drug Use: A National Survey
- An efficient clustering-based retrieval framework for real crime scene footwear marks