Probation and parole professionals argue that supervision outcomes would improve if caseloads were reduced below commonly achieved standards. Criminal justice researchers are skeptical because random assignment and strong observation studies have failed to show that criminal recidivism decreases with reductions in caseload sizes. One explanation is that caseload reduction by itself is insufficient; supervision must also be allotted and distributed to make the best use of supervision resources, a cornerstone of evidence-based practice (EBP). This study uses a regression discontinuity design (RDD) to test the null hypothesis that reduced caseload in an agency using EBP has no effect on criminal recidivism. The conclusions are that reduced caseloads in this context probably reduce criminal recidivism and probably do not increase revocations for technical violations. Tables, figures, notes, and references (Published Abstract)
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Criminal Justice Interventions for Offenders With Mental Illness: Evaluation of Mental Health Courts in Bronx and Brooklyn, New York, Executive Summary
- Evaluation of the Implementation of Community Correction in Oregon, Colorado and Connecticut - Final Report
- Drug Use as a Predictor of Rearrest or Failure to Appear: A User's Guide to the Machine-Readable Files and Documentation, Original Instruments, and Codebook