The program requires participants to abstain from drugs and relies upon urinalysis, hair analysis, and self-reported drug use to monitor compliance. Approximately 90 percent of the cases in diversion are narcotics possession cases; approximately 67 percent came into the program from normal prosecutorial screening, 21 percent at the request of the defendant's attorney, and 12 percent from other sources. Data covering 7 months of program operation were reported through September 1993. Results revealed that hair analysis appears to be a more effective method of identifying drug exposure than either urinalysis or self-reported drug use. Furthermore, hair analysis provides several other advantages to program operations. Finally, implementing the hair analysis protocols did not involve any notable problems. Findings that hair assays, when included in a program of urine testing, counseling, and close supervisory monitoring of cocaine-involved offenders can have a major impact on increasing detection sensitivity, bolstering therapist morale, discouraging or defeating evasion by clients, and creating higher levels of compliance in the target population. Tables and 48 references (Author abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Jail Overcrowding and Pretrial Detention - An Evaluation of Program Alternatives - Executive Summary
- Predicting Pretrial Misconduct with Drug Tests of Arrestees: Evidence from Eight Settings, Research Report
- Patterns of Concordance Between Hair Assays and Urinalysis for Cocaine: Longitudinal Analysis of Probationers in Pinellas County, Florida (From The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates, P 161-199, 1997, Lana Harri