Such dolls can be used in investigative interviews, case evaluation, and during courtroom testimony. The use of dolls can aid in establishing rapport and reducing stress for the victim, establishing competency, reducing vocabulary problems, and showing what may be difficult to discuss for the child. Some critics have suggested that anatomical dolls may suggest abuse and sexual impropriety, can be used in ways contrary to accepted protocol, and may appear bizarre and frightening to children. When planning the interview, the interviewer should take into account the age of the child, whether or not there have been earlier interviews, and the results of those interviews. When using dolls, the interviewer should inspect them, read accompanying manuals, and ascertain that the dolls are appropriate in appearance and scale. Used appropriately, anatomical dolls can be an effective way of helping children explain what happened to them and determining the child's sexual vocabulary. Used improperly, their use can block communication, inhibit a proper case filing decision, and cause case problems related to charges of coaching the child witness. 15 references.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Identifying Subtypes of Image-Based Sexual Abuse and their Distinct Incident Characteristics, Victimization Histories, and Personal Correlates
- Protective Factors for Sexual Violence: Understanding How Trajectories Relate to Perpetration in High School
- One Group or Many? Identifying Distinct Profiles of Adolescents Involved in Image-Based Sexual Abuse