Analysis of Written Conductive Energy Device Policies: Are Municipal Policing Agencies Meeting PERF Recommendations?

• NCJ Number: 242885
• Journal: Criminal Justice Policy Review Volume: 23 Issue: 4 Dated: December 2012 Pages: 399-426
• Author(s): Kyle J. Thomas; Peter A. Collins; Nicholas P. Lovrich
• Date Published: December 2012
• Length: 28 pages
• Publication Format: Article
• Publication Type: Report (Study/Research)
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America

Annotation

This study reviewed and compared the written conductive energy device (CED) policies of 124 municipal policing agencies to the model policies set forth by Police Executive Research Forum (PERF).

Abstract

Although scholars have recognized the utility of conductive energy devices as less-than-lethal force tools, there have been concerns over the misuse of the device and the adverse health effects associated with its use in the field. In an attempt to improve policy, scholars and policing organizations, such as the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), have developed "model" written CED policies as guidelines. It is expected that adherence to these policies can improve the overall effectiveness of the device as well as reduce many negative outcomes. This study reviews and compares the written CED policies of 124 municipal policing agencies to the model policies set forth by PERF. The findings indicate that municipal police agencies have done a rather poor job meeting these recommendations. Implications and recommendations for making broad improvements to CED policies are discussed. Abstract published by arrangement with Sage Journals.