U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Decision-Making in Familial Database Searching: KI Alone or Not Alone?

NCJ Number
241098
Journal
Forensic Science International: Genetics Volume: 7 Issue: 1 Dated: January 2013 Pages: 52-54
Author(s)
David J. Balding; Michael Krawczak; John S. Buckleton; James M. Curran
Date Published
January 2013
Length
3 pages
Annotation
This study considered the comparison of hypotheses "parent-child" or "full siblings" against the alternative of "unrelated" for pairs of individuals for whom DNA profiles are available.
Abstract

The authors considered the comparison of hypotheses "parent-child" or "full siblings" against the alternative of "unrelated" for pairs of individuals for whom DNA profiles are available. This is a situation that occurs repeatedly in familial database searching. A decision rule that uses both the kinship index (KI), also known as the likelihood ratio, and the identity-by-state statistic (IBS) was advocated in a recent report as superior to the use of KI alone. Such proposal appears to conflict with the Neyman-Pearson Lemma of statistics, which states that the likelihood ratio alone provides the most powerful criterion for distinguishing between any two simple hypotheses. The authors therefore performed a simulation study that was two orders of magnitude larger than in the previous report, and their results corroborated the theoretical expectation that KI alone provides a better decision rule than KI combined with IBS. (Published Abstract)