U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Differentiating Between Genuine Damage and Falsified Damage to a Garment Following an Alleged Sexual Assault

NCJ Number
242534
Journal
Journal of Forensic Sciences Volume: 57 Issue: 6 Dated: November 2012 Pages: 1634-1636
Author(s)
Graham Williams, M.Sc.; Imran Haider, B.Sc.
Date Published
November 2012
Length
3 pages
Annotation
The aim of this study was to determine an allegation of sexual assault was made in which a bra was torn off by the assailant causing extensive damage.
Abstract
An allegation of sexual assault was made in which a bra was torn off by the assailant causing extensive damage; however, it was observed that the hook and eye fastening was still intact. It was felt that it was not possible for a garment to receive such damage without damage to the hook and eye fastening, thus indicating that the complainant caused the damage to the bra herself to support a false allegation. Reconstruction experiments were conducted in which the conditions of the allegation were simulated utilizing a range of similar bras. Following the infliction of damage, the hook and eye fastenings were examined. In eight of nine experiments, the hook and eye fastening were intact, despite the application of enough force to cause separation of the bra cups in five of the experiments. This shows that bras may suffer extensive damage without damage to the hook and eye fastening. Abstract published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons.