U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

Interaction Between Law and Morality in Jewish Law in the Areas of Feticide and Killing a Terminally Ill Individual

NCJ Number
194310
Journal
Criminal Justice Ethics Volume: 11 Issue: 2 Dated: Summer/Fall 1992 Pages: 76-84
Author(s)
Daniel B. Sinclair
Date Published
1992
Length
9 pages
Annotation
This article examines the tension between the demands of rational morality and the exclusion of feticide and the killing of a terminally ill person from the category of culpable homicide in Jewish criminal law.
Abstract
This paper investigates the mechanisms used by the "halakhah" to defuse this tension in Jewish law. It also examines similar tension between the provisions of the criminal law and rational morality in Islamic jurisprudence and the defense of necessity in the Common Law. Some rabbinical authorities have sought a formal basis for prohibiting feticide in existing "halakhah." Their suggestions include assault and the notion of potential life. Others have simply indicated the existence of the tension and left the matter there. The paper discusses the killing of a terminally ill person, monarchial corrective criminal jurisdiction in Jewish and Islamic law, and sacrificing a terminally ill person for the sake of saving a viable one. Abortion and the treatment of the terminally ill are dynamic areas of Jewish law as a result of the dialectical nature of that system and its long history of casuistic reasoning. Notes