U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Level of Scienter Required for Child Pornography Distributors: The Supreme Court's Interpretation of "Knowingly" in 18 U.S.C. 2252

NCJ Number
165867
Journal
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume: 86 Issue: 4 Dated: (Summer 1996) Pages: 1341-1382
Author(s)
C Egan
Date Published
1996
Length
42 pages
Annotation
This note critiques the U. S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 115 S. Ct. 464 (1994), in which the Court held that 18 U.S.C. Section 2252, a statute that criminalizes the distribution of child pornography, requires the government to prove that a distributor had knowledge of the sexually explicit nature of the materials and the age of the performers.
Abstract
The dissent disagreed with the majority's interpretation of that statute, arguing that the grammatical structure of the provision precluded reading the statute to require scienter. Without a scienter requirement, a distributor would be held strictly liable for distribution of child pornography regardless of his knowledge of the contents of the materials he distributed. The Court reversed the ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, agreeing with the defendant, and holding that Section 2252 is constitutional because the word "knowingly" extends to both the sexually explicit nature of the materials and to the age of the performers. This note supports the majority's decision; however, the majority's analysis was not entirely correct. The majority assumed that the statute required knowledge as the applicable level of scienter. It failed to evaluate alternative levels of scienter. The majority should have considered recklessness as an applicable scienter level. 266 footnotes

Downloads

No download available

Availability