U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

‘Micro-Cultures’ of Conflict: Couple-Level Perspectives on Intimate Partner Violence in Young Adulthood

NCJ Number
307620
Journal
Journal of Marriage and Family Volume: 84 Issue: 4 Dated: 2022 Pages: 1062-1080
Author(s)
Peggy C. Giordano; Mackenzie M. Grace; Monica A. Longmore; Wendy D. Manning
Date Published
2022
Length
19 pages
Annotation

This paper describes an analysis of couple-level concerns and ways in which dyadic communication contributes to young-adult couples’ shared understandings about reasons for conflict in their relationships.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to highlight the development of young adult couples' shared understandings about reasons for conflict in their relationships, views about why some disagreements included the use of aggression (“causes”), and gendered perspectives on these relationship dynamics. Feminist theories have centered on relationship dynamics associated with intimate partner violence (IPV), but have focused primarily on men's concerns, such as jealousy, and use of violence as a means of control over female partners. The current analysis drew on symbolic interaction theory as a framework for exploring couple-level concerns, and ways in which dyadic communication contributes to these understandings, or what can be considered “micro-cultures” of conflict. The study relied on in-depth interviews with a heterogeneous sample of IPV-experienced young adults who had participated in a larger longitudinal study, Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS), and separate interviews with their partners. Analyses revealed that women's concerns about men's actions (e.g., infidelity) were frequently cited as reasons for serious conflicts and showed significant concordance in partners' reports. Shared understandings sometimes extended to views on the role of more distal causes, such as family background, and the meaning(s) of each partner's use of aggression. Gendered dynamics included men's tendency to minimize women's concerns, and both partners' more open discussions of women's perpetration. The paper concludes that theories of IPV and associated programmatic efforts should include attention to the social construction of these “micro-cultures,” as these shared meanings affect behavior, are potentially malleable, and add to the more intuitive focus on one-sided forces of control and constraint. Publisher Abstract Provided