This study examined how probation officers (POs) use validated risk-and-needs-assessment (RNA) tools in two adult probation settings.
RNA tools are well regarded as a critical component of a community corrections organization in implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs), given the potential impact of using such tools on offender-level and system outcomes. Findings suggest that POs overwhelmingly administer the RNA tool, but rarely link the RNA scores to key case management or supervision decisions. These findings highlight some of the challenges and complexities associated with the application of RNA tools in everyday practice. Study implications emphasize the need to modify current probation practices to create a synergy between the RNA and related supervision practices. Findings from this study contribute to a better appreciation for how the new penology integrates risk management with client-centered case models to improve outcomes. (Publisher abstract modified)