U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Morphoscopic ancestry estimates in Filipino crania using multivariate probit regression models

NCJ Number
301967
Journal
American Journal of Physical Anthropology Dated: 2020
Author(s)
M. C. Go ; J. T. Hefner
Date Published
2020
Annotation

Since probit has not been applied to ancestry estimation in forensic anthropology, the current study (1) evaluated the performance of probit analysis as a classification tool for ancestry estimation using ordinal data and (2) expanded the current understanding of human cranial variation for an understudied population.

Abstract

Multivariate probit models were used to classify the ancestral affiliation of Filipino crania using morphoscopic traits. Ancestral reference populations represented Africa, Asia, and Europe in a three-group model, with the addition of Hispanics in a four-group model. Posterior probabilities across these groups were interpreted as admixture proportions of an individual. Model performance was also evaluated for individuals with missing data. The overall correct classification rates for the three-group and four-group models were 72.1 percent and 68.6 percent, respectively. Filipinos classified as Asian 52.9 percent of the time using three ancestral reference groups and 48.6 percent using four groups. A large portion of Filipinos also classified as African. There were no significant differences in classification trends or accuracy rates between complete crania and crania with at least one missing variable. The study concluded that multivariate probit models using morphoscopic traits perform well when populations are represented in both training and test samples. Probit can also accommodate individuals with missing data. Classifying Filipinos showed only moderate success. Filipinos are more phenotypically similar to Africans than the other Asian samples used here, but still affiliate most closely as Asian. Ancestry methods would benefit from including Filipinos as a reference sample given the additional variation they provide to the continental category of Asian. (publisher abstract modified)