U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Patellar Tilt Calculation Utilizing Artificial Intelligence on CT Knee Imaging

NCJ Number
310312
Author(s)
Johannes Sieberer; Albert Rancu; Nancy Park; Shelby Desroches; Armita R. Manafzadeh; Steven Tommasinia; Daniel H. Wiznia; John Fulkerson
Date Published
June 2025
Length
5 pages
Annotation

This article discusses the methodology and findings gained from efforts to diagnose patellar instability through three-dimensional imaging that enables measurement of a wide range of metrics; it offers evidence that a commercially available software can identify the necessary anatomical landmarks for patellar tilt calculation and offer a potential method for increasing automation of surgical decision-making metrics.

Abstract

In the diagnosis of patellar instability, three-dimensional (3D) imaging enables measurement of a wide range of metrics. However, measuring these metrics can be time-consuming and prone to error due to conducting 2D measurements on 3D objects. This study aims to measure patellar tilt in 3D and automate it by utilizing a commercial AI algorithm for landmark placement. CT-scans of 30 patients with at least two dislocation events and 30 controls without patellofemoral disease were acquired. Patellar tilt was measured using three different methods: the established method, and by calculating the angle between 3D-landmarks placed by either a human rater or an AI algorithm. Correlations between the three measurements were calculated using interclass correlation coefficients, and differences with a Kruskal-Wallis test. Significant differences of means between patients and controls were calculated using Mann-Whitney U tests. Significance was assumed at 0.05 adjusted with the Bonferroni method. No significant differences (overall: p = 0.10, patients: 0.51, controls: 0.79) between methods were found. Predicted ICC between the methods ranged from 0.86 to 0.90 with a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.77–0.94. Differences between patients and controls were significant (p < 0.001) for all three methods. The study offers an alternative 3D approach for calculating patellar tilt comparable to traditional, manual measurements. Furthermore, this analysis offers evidence that a commercially available software can identify the necessary anatomical landmarks for patellar tilt calculation, offering a potential pathway to increased automation of surgical decision-making metrics. (Published Abstract Provided)