NCJ Number
              109057
          Journal
  Santa Clara Computer and High-Technology Law Journal Volume: 3 Issue: 1 Dated: (January 1987) Pages: 165-187
Date Published
  1987
Length
              23 pages
          Annotation
              This paper examines the language of the Canadian criminal law amendments to the Criminal code as they relate to computer abuse offenses and compares them to California Penal Code provisions.
          Abstract
              The new amendments redefine property to include electronically stored information and computer software and provide a broad definition of computers. They also cover unauthorized use of computer services and include a 'mischief' offense covering deliberate alteration or destruction of data. A major problem with the amendments is unworkable and confusing definitions that would permit prosecution for unauthorized use of a pocket calculator and do not adequately deal with the issue of information as property.  Such issues have yet to be resolved by the courts. In Canada, the definition of property remains narrow in scope and does not relate to information. In California, by contrast, the Penal Code incorporates such concepts as trade secrets, data, and computer programs into the definition of property and considers information that can be stolen. Comprehensive technology-oriented statutes with suitable definitional parameters should be developed in Canada that will afford adequate protection of intellectual property. 70 footnotes.