NCJ Number
              30782
          Date Published
  1975
Length
              27 pages
          Annotation
              A REVIEW OF THE LEGAL BASIS FOR THE RIGHT TO TREATMENT AS DEFINED BY THE COURTS, AND A DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUES RELEVANT TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THAT RIGHT.
          Abstract
              LEGAL ARGUMENTS SUPPORTING THE EXISTENCE OF A RIGHT TO TREATMENT HAVE BEEN STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL - DIE PROCESS, EQUAL PROTECTION, CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT, AND INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE. COURT DECISIONS RELATING TO THESE CLAIMS ARE CITED. THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING ADEQUATE TREATMENT IS DISCUSSED. ALSO CITED ARE COURT DECISIONS RELATING TO THE EVEN LESS CLEARLY DEFINED RIGHT TO REFUSE TREATMENT. THE REQUIREMENTS OF 'INFORMED CONSENT', ESPECIALLY IN DEALING WITH MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS, ARE DISCUSSED. WHERE NO ADEQUATE TREATMENT IS AVAILABLE, THE JUSTIFICATION FOR CONFINEMENT MUST CENTER ON THE INDIVIDUAL'S DANGEROUSNESS. STRICT ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHT OT TREATMENT WOULD, IT IS SAID, RESULT IN SHARP INCREASES IN COSTS FOR CORRECTIONS.
          