U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Us Versus Them? The Problem of Cognitive Distortions in Policing

NCJ Number
308641
Journal
Police Quarterly Volume: OnlineFirst Dated: February 2024
Author(s)
Scott E. Wolfe; Kyle Mclean; Jeff Rojek
Date Published
February 2024
Annotation

This paper discusses the methodology and outcomes of two studies aimed at determining how much one cognitive distortion among police officers was associated with problematic orientations about use of force and citizen interactions.

Abstract

The literature on cognitive distortions offers insight on why we continue to face reform challenges regarding police use-of-force- and citizen interaction-related outcomes. The authors used two studies of police officers to determine the extent to which one cognitive distortion (dichotomous thinking) was associated with problematic orientations about use of force and citizen interactions. In Study 1, they found that dichotomous thinking was associated with weaker support for de-escalation, procedural justice, and maintaining self-control during hypothetical citizen interactions. Dichotomous thinking also was associated with more support for force-related misconduct. Study 2 showed that officers who engaged in dichotomous thinking were more likely to perceive an immediate and serious threat from watching suspects in body-worn camera videos. Also, they were more likely to believe suspects had greater ability, opportunity, and intent to cause harm. The authors discuss the practical implications of these findings for policing and police reform. (Published Abstract Provided).