U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Validation of a Typology for Rapist

NCJ Number
177707
Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence Volume: 14 Issue: 3 Dated: March 1999 Pages: 303-330
Author(s)
Raymond Knight
Date Published
1999
Length
28 pages
Annotation

A taxonomic program developed to study rapists is described that recognizes sexual aggression in general and rape in particular are determined by multiple interacting variables and that acknowledges rapists constitute a markedly heterogeneous group.

Abstract

The Massachusetts Treatment Center (MTC) Taxonomic Program was created specifically to determine whether useful taxonomic solutions to the heterogeneity problem could be generated. Data were gathered from multiple sources, including detailed clinical and criminal files of offenders, standardized tests, clinical interviews, self-report instruments developed to target specific areas of concern, and follow-up criminal record sources. Two taxonomic research strategies were employed, rational-deductive and empirical-inductive, to generate and test taxonomic systems. An analysis of rapist types resulted in four primary motivations: opportunity, pervasive anger, sexual gratification, and vindictiveness. These motivations appeared to be related to enduring behavioral patterns that distinguished particular offender groups. The structure and effectiveness of the MTC Rapist Typology are described, and treatment implications of the typology are discussed. The author compares underlying dimensions of the typology with behavioral domains that have emerged as targets in the treatment of sexually aggressive and persistently violent offenders. This speculative comparison of dimensions and treatment targets provides an opportunity to hypothesize about possible interfaces between the typology and therapeutic intervention. 36 references, 4 tables, and 4 figures