U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Vulnerable Victims, Monstrous Offenders, and Unmanageable Risk: Explaining Public Opinion on the Social Control of Sex Crime

NCJ Number
245319
Journal
Criminology Volume: 51 Issue: 3 Dated: August 2013 Pages: 729-759
Author(s)
Justin T. Pickett; Christina Mancini; Daniel P. Mears
Date Published
August 2013
Length
31 pages
Annotation
This study examined three models of public opinion on punishment of sex offenders.
Abstract
With the possible exception of terrorists, sex offenders in the United States experience a greater degree of punishment and restriction than any other offender group, nonviolent or violent. Members of the public overwhelmingly support "get tough" sex crime policies and display an intense hostility toward persons labeled "sex criminals." The theoretical literature has identified three models potentially explaining public opinion on the social control of sex crime: the victim-oriented concerns model, the sex offender stereotypes model, and the risk-management concerns model. However, empirical work that directly tests these models is absent. This article addresses that gap by analyzing national survey data that includes measures of the key concepts outlined in the different theoretical models and items gauging support for punitive sex crime laws as well as support for sex offender treatment. The findings provide partial support for all three models but suggest that extant theories can better explain support for punitive sex crime policies than views about sex offender treatment. (Published Abstract)