The authors are responding to a recent letter appearing in Forensic Science International: Genetics entitled “Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24″, authored by Dennis McNevin, Kirsty Wright, Janet Chaseling, and Mark Barash [ [1] ] (hereafter MWCB).
In their letter they acknowledge that Bright et al. is a “valuable first step in establishing a foundational validity for mixture interpretation using probabilistic software, as recommended by the PCAST report” and suggest further experiments to “better address this issue”. 57 references (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Two-Stage Approach for the Inference of the Source of High-Dimension and Complex Chemical Data in Forensic Science
- DNA-Based Identification of Forensically Important Lucilia (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in the Continental United States
- Reports of Adverse Events Associated With Use of Novel Psychoactive Substances, 2013-2016: A Review