Mass shootings have a severe impact on victims and society, and understanding this form of violence is a national criminal justice priority. Law enforcement and researchers have produced greater knowledge about these events in recent years, but the field is limited by the absence of a uniform definition of mass shootings and a lack of consistent data sources on attempted and completed mass shooting incidents. This article summarizes the findings of the National Institute of Justice's (NIJ) systematic review of the literature on mass shootings and explains that literature's limitations. It also reports on a series of recent NIJ-led meetings with leading researchers and law enforcement practitioners, discussing their points of consensus and divergence on the subject of mass shootings as well as their recommendations for moving the field forward in both research and prevention efforts.
Similar Publications
- The Role of Simulated Data in Making the Best Predictions (from the 87th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists - 2018)
- Third-Party Policing: A Randomized Field Trial to Assess Drug Crime Reduction and Police-Hotel Partnerships
- Changing Course: Preventing Gang Membership, Conclusion: An Invitation To Contribute to Gang-Joining