NCJ Number
169274
Date Published
April 1998
Length
2 pages
Annotation
Case processing statistics maintained by Federal criminal justice agencies are not comparable due to the way in which agencies tally defendants and cases processed, define defendants processed, classify offenses committed, and classify dispositions and sentences imposed.
Abstract
This joint statement of five Federal criminal justice agencies identifies the primary differences in case processing statistics reported by the agencies and explains why reported statistics are not directly comparable across agencies. By examining issues central to the collection and reporting of Federal criminal justice statistics (defendants processed, offenses committed, and disposition and sentence imposed) this statement clarifies differences in emphasis, definition, and classification. Originally published in August 1996, this updated edition identifies an additional factor that contributes to the disparity in the statistics reported by each of the agencies.
Date Published: April 1, 1998
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Study of Government-Subsidized Housing Rehabilitation Programs and Arson - Analysis of Programs Administered in New York City, 1978-1981 - Executive Summary
- Comparative Forensic Soil Analysis of New Jersey State Parks Using a Combination of Simple Techniques with Multivariate Statistics
- Using a Serious Drug Abuser Scale in the Criminal Justice System: Final Report, Expanding Applications of Drug Use Forecasting Data in New York