Although research on terrorism has grown rapidly in recent years, few scholars have applied criminological theories to the analysis of individual-level political extremism. Instead, researchers focused on radicalization have drawn primarily from political science and psychology and have overwhelmingly concentrated on violent extremists, leaving little variation in the dependent variable. The results of the current study show that variables related to social control (lack of stable employment), social learning (radical peers), psychological perspectives (history of mental illness), and criminal record all have significant effects on participation in violent political extremism and are robust across multiple techniques for imputing missing data. At the same time, other common indicators of social control (e.g., education and marital status) and social learning perspectives (e.g., radical family members) were not significant in the multivariate models. The study argues that terrorism research would benefit from including criminology insights and political radicalization as a dynamic, evolving process, much as life-course criminology treats more common forms of crime. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Deterrence and Moral Persuasion Effects on Corporate Tax Compliance: Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial
- Forced Condensation of Cyanoacrylate With Temperature Control of the Evidence Surface To Modify Polymer Formation and Improve Fingerprint Visualization
- Prevalence Estimates and Correlates of Elder Abuse in the United States: The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey