In a discussion, panelists note that incarceration rates have dropped markedly since the program's inception in 1984. Public support of the program has been good because offenders pay restitution, pay the State to offset the cost of supervision, and work to support dependents and families. Also discussed are concerns that such programs require probation officers to act more like police officers, the potential for de-emphasizing rehabilitation, and the possibility that house arrest may result in net-broadening.
Watch
Similar Publications
- Discretion as weakness: Exploring the relationship between correctional officers' attitudes toward discretion and attempted boundary violations
- Trauma and Long-Term Memory for Childhood Events: Impact Matters
- Posttraumatic Overmodulation, Callous-Unemotional Traits, and Offending Among justice-involved Youth