In this study, an experimental design with random assignment was used in three cities (Miami, Milwaukee, and Portland) to test whether defendants denied initial pretrial release can later be screened and released under close supervision without adversely affecting arrest and failure to appear rates. The results are generally positive with approximately 90 percent of the defendants not being arrested or becoming fugitive. These success rates were superior to rates for other forms of pretrial release. We also present suggestions on how a model Supervised Pretrial Release (SPR) should be structured and operated by local jurisdictions. (Author abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Public Danger as a Factor in Pretrial Release, Volume 1: Final Report
- The New Solitary Confinement? A Conceptual Framework for Guiding and Assessing Research and Policy on "Restrictive Housing"
- The Impact of Counsel at First Appearance on Pretrial Release in Felony Arraignments: The Case of Rural Jurisdictions