This study tested the impact of a procedural justice policing intervention, relative to routine police behavior, during traffic stops for excessive speeding in Adana, Turkey.
The study found that the infusion of procedural justice principles into police traffic stops does improve citizens’ perceptions of the specific encounter relative to routine police traffic stops, but the procedural justice treatment did not generate a robust improvement in citizens’ general perceptions of traffic officers. These results indicate it might be overly optimistic to suggest a single positive encounter can exert a strong influence on durable citizen perceptions of confidence and trust in the police. In a randomized controlled trial, drivers stopped by traffic officers for speeding violations were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. Subjects in the treatment group received the procedural justice policing intervention during traffic stops, while subjects in the control group experienced business-as-usual traffic stops. Treatment officer behavior was guided by a script that helped to ensure that key components of a procedurally just encounter were delivered. After completion of the traffic stop, drivers were interviewed on the encounter and general perceptions of traffic police. In addition to ensuring procedurally-just encounters, police executives and police makers should also pay attention to other relevant performance dimensions such as crime control effectiveness, distributive fairness, and lawfulness to change global perceptions of the police. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Evaluation of Mitogenome Sequence Concordance, Heteroplasmy Detection, and Haplogrouping in a Worldwide Lineage Study Using the Precision ID mtDNA Whole Genome Panel
- Lab Retriever: a software tool for calculating likelihood ratios incorporating a probability of drop-out for forensic DNA profiles
- Long-Term Arrest and School Outcomes of the Philadelphia Police School Diversion Program