Members of Sexual Assault Response Teams (SARTs) coordinate and improve the community response to sexual assault. A SART's effectiveness is likely influenced by its sociocultural context, or the norms, values, and beliefs of the local community; however, this has yet to be empirically examined. The current study found that SART leaders believed that specific norms and beliefs held by the general public in their community (rape myths and victim blame, denial of sexual assault happening locally, taboos against discussing sexual assault, and a male-dominated environment) delegitimized sexual assault as a problem that deserved public intervention. Leaders believed these led community members to resist the team's efforts by decreasing the community's support and buy-in to the SART, interfering with efforts to make services accessible to survivors and obstructing the SART's ability to effectively respond to cases. In addition, some leaders believed highly interconnected communities compromised the accessibility and objectivity of systems that respond to sexual assault. These findings suggest that SARTs need to tailor their efforts to improve accessibility of systems and the response to sexual assault cases, based on their distinctive local sociocultural context. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- “Nothing I said would have mattered”: Categorizing barriers to intervening in workplace mistreatment
- Protecting Public Transportation From Terrorists
- Men Do Matter: Ethnographic Insights on the Socially Supportive Role of the African American Uncle in the Lives of Inner-City African American Male Youth