This study examined the relationship between DNA evidence and outcomes of prosecution of sexual assault.
Researchers coded data from prosecutor and crime laboratory files for sexual assault cases referred to prosecutors between 2005 and 2011 in a metropolitan jurisdiction in the northeastern United States. Cases with a DNA match were significantly more likely to move forward and result in conviction, even with other predictor variables statistically controlled. Analyses suggest DNA evidence contributes to case progression but also is a result of it. These findings strengthen the case for quality forensic medical examinations, investment in DNA analysis, and increased prosecutor training. (Publisher Abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- PartialEdit: Identifying Partial Deepfakes in the Era of Neural Speech Editing
- Subadult Age Estimation Using the Mixed Cumulative Probit and a Contemporary United States Population
- Cross-validation and evaluation of the performance of methods for the elemental analysis of forensic glass by μ-XRF, ICP-MS, and LA-ICP-MS