The authors are responding to a recent letter appearing in Forensic Science International: Genetics entitled “Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24″, authored by Dennis McNevin, Kirsty Wright, Janet Chaseling, and Mark Barash [ [1] ] (hereafter MWCB).
In their letter they acknowledge that Bright et al. is a “valuable first step in establishing a foundational validity for mixture interpretation using probabilistic software, as recommended by the PCAST report” and suggest further experiments to “better address this issue”. 57 references (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Use of HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatograpy) With Diode Array Detection for the Analysis and Relative Dating of Inks and the Differentiation of Fiber Dyes
- High-throughput Screening of Coke-resistant Catalyst with Thermal Barcode
- Evaluation of a 49 InDel Marker HID Panel in Two Specific Populations of South America and One Population of Northern Africa