Meta-analysis, a research method referred to as the quantitative analysis of studies, has been used extensively in social science. Along with the proliferation of meta-analysis as a research methodology, there is some evidence that it may be influential with policy and program decisionmakers. Practitioners look for more conclusive evidence before taking action and find a meta-analysis of many studies bearing on the issue more persuasive than a single one. Following a discussion of the importance of defining the inclusion criteria for the studies included in the meta-analysis, the eight study inclusions criteria for this study are listed. These research criteria distinguish this study from nearly all prior meta-analyses of intervention efficacy in criminal justice. Recommendations are that the specification of inclusion criteria be given careful consideration before the document-retrieval phase; inclusion criteria may need to be redefined when "gray-area" studies are found; and before specifying inclusion criteria, decide whether it may be better to include "gray-area" studies in a future meta- analysis. 5 notes and 64 references
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Reassessing the Breadth of the Protective Benefit of Immigrant Neighborhoods: A Multilevel Analysis of Violence Risk by Race, Ethnicity, and Labor Market Stratification
- Advancing Police-researcher Collaboration and Evidence-based Policing: an Evaluation of the Applied Criminology and Data Management Course
- Does Lying Require More or Less Working Memory and What Does it Mean for the Legal System