Significant contributions of age, sex, peer group values, and preference for beer suggested the operation of socialization to group norms. There was a substantial contribution of personal moral commitment against drinking and driving. However, there was no significant inhibitory influence of legal knowledge and perceived arrest risk. These findings are consistent with Andenaes's view that general deterrence should be more broadly construed to include the moral component as well as the fear component of the law. (Publisher abstract)
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Drinking-Driver in Madison - A Study of the Problem and the Community's Response, Volume 2
- What Came First: the Police or the Incident? Bidirectional Relationships Between Police Actions and Police Incidents
- Problem-Oriented Policing, Deterrence, and Youth Violence: An Evaluation of Boston’s Operation Ceasefire