Significant contributions of age, sex, peer group values, and preference for beer suggested the operation of socialization to group norms. There was a substantial contribution of personal moral commitment against drinking and driving. However, there was no significant inhibitory influence of legal knowledge and perceived arrest risk. These findings are consistent with Andenaes's view that general deterrence should be more broadly construed to include the moral component as well as the fear component of the law. (Publisher abstract)
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Choice To Drink and Drive and the Influence of Criminal Sanctions - An Empirical Evaluation of Swedish Data
- Success Story: NIJ and The Virginia Department of Forensic Science Advancing Drug Analysis in Forensic Toxicology for Enhanced Judicial Outcomes
- What Came First: the Police or the Incident? Bidirectional Relationships Between Police Actions and Police Incidents