U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

And Justice for All: Determinants and Effects of Probation Officers' Processing Decisions Regarding First-Time Juvenile Offenders Psychology Public Policy and Law

NCJ Number
251847
Journal
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law Volume: 23 Issue: 1 Dated: 2017 Pages: 105-116
Author(s)
Adam. Fine; Sachiko Donley; Caitlin Cavanagh; Sarah Miltimore; Laurence Steinberg; Paul J. Frick; Elizabeth Cauffman
Date Published
2017
Length
11 pages
Annotation
This study examined how extralegal factors affect probation processing decisions, and whether processing is associated with youth reoffending and rearrest, drawing on data from probation officer assessment interviews with 359 male, first-time, low-level juvenile offenders, as well as longitudinal self-report and official records of a youth's reoffending after his first arrest.
Abstract
When a youth is accused of committing a crime, juvenile justice system arbiters, such as probation officers, interview both the youth and the youth's guardian to gather information before deciding to either process the youth formally or informally. Factors about a youth that are unrelated to the criminal charge may contribute to arbiters' processing decisions. Such extralegal factors include demographic characteristics and characteristics of the youth's context (e.g., home environment, peer delinquency). Little is known about how extralegal factors other than age and race affect youth processing. The findings of the current study indicate that even after taking into account legal factors and demographic characteristics, youth are more likely to be processed formally if they refuse to comment on the charge, if their probation officers believe their guardians to be relatively more disapproving of their friends, and if their probation officers perceive their home environments to be more problematic. Although youth who are processed formally self-report reoffending at the same rate as youth who are processed informally, youth who are processed formally are more likely to be rearrested in the subsequent 6 months. Implications for how processing decisions may promote sustained involvement in the juvenile justice system are discussed. (Publisher abstract modified)